Paper Review Process
RTS only publishes original unpublished papers and uses the double blind peer review procedure (the reviewers do not know the identity of the authors of the papers and the authors do not know the identity of the reviewers). This ensures the review is objective and in keeping with the quality criteria applicable to scientific publications.
All papers processed shall be subject to an initial assessment by the Editorial Board in terms of its alignment with the standards of the journal, the editorial aims and scientific quality.
The external review process, involving a double blind peer review system, begins once the Editorial Board has proposed the respective reviewers to be appointed for each paper, according to their specialist field. Communication with said reviewers shall be conducted through the RTS technical support team and the former shall be given the journal's review guidelines. The review should take into consideration: the originality of the text, the quality and rigour of the work, the opportunity and relevance for social work and social intervention, presentation and the wording of the text, and the suitability of the bibliography cited. All of these aspects are set out in the review guidelines that will be given to the reviewers, which are also published on the website to assure transparency. In each issue a list of the reviewers involved in its preparation will be published.
The reviewers shall uphold confidentiality with regard to the text and the review. They shall also declare any conflict of interest they may have in personal, academic, research-related or other terms which would disqualify them from reviewing a specific assigned paper.
The authors will be informed about the review process and they will be notified about the outcome of this decision. Moreover, the authors shall incorporate the changes suggested by the external reviewers within the period specified to them.
The duration of the paper review process shall be at least three months, provided no major changes are needed to the text; otherwise, the timeframe of the review process shall depend on the point at which the issue to be published is at in the editorial process, although it shall not exceed six months.
The paper review process shall incorporate the following stages:
1. Receipt of the paper at RTS
The authors shall submit their paper to the journal by registering and filling in the form on the journal website (www.revistarts.com/enviaments):- The checklist of items requested shall be completed on the web page.
- The paper shall adhere to the RTS rules of submission.
- RTS shall notify the authors that their paper has been received correctly and that the review process is underway.
- The authors shall submit original anonymised papers.
- It is advisable to avoid overuse of self-citations and, if these are used, they shall be sufficiently neutral as to allow the reading of the text during the blind review to not reveal their status as self-citations.


